August 21, 2014
was-that-a-pun:

superpunch2:

Mars is the only planet in the solar system solely inhabited by functioning robots.

oh


Transformers new home planet? Lol :-)

was-that-a-pun:

superpunch2:

Mars is the only planet in the solar system solely inhabited by functioning robots.

oh

Transformers new home planet? Lol :-)

(via verusmihi)

August 21, 2014

verusmihi:

aimso:

Apparently how people feel after waking up from naps.

image

How I feel after waking up from naps.

image

literally took me 2 hours to wake up from my nap

Every time lol

(Source: copernicus-qwark)

August 19, 2014
ragingprogressive:

memegop:

‪#‎MemeGOP‬ ‪#‎UniteBlue‬ ‪#‎VoteBlue‬

Ugh


REALLY!!!!??? It’s you’re job to question everyone with authority, regardless of party…

ragingprogressive:

memegop:

‪#‎MemeGOP‬ ‪#‎UniteBlue‬ ‪#‎VoteBlue‬

Ugh

REALLY!!!!??? It’s you’re job to question everyone with authority, regardless of party…

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

August 19, 2014
thinksquad:

The California Supreme Court has ruled that the silence of suspects can be used against them.
Wading into a legally tangled vehicular manslaughter case, a sharply divided high court on Thursday effectively reinstated the felony conviction of a man accused in a 2007 San Francisco Bay Area crash that left an 8-year-old girl dead and her sister and mother injured.
Richard Tom was sentenced to seven years in prison for manslaughter after authorities said he was speeding and slammed into another vehicle at a Redwood City intersection.
Prosecutors repeatedly told jurors during the trial that Tom’s failure to ask about the victims immediately after the crash but before police read him his so-called Miranda rights showed his guilt.
Legal analysts said the ruling could affect future cases, allowing prosecutors to exploit a suspect’s refusal to talk before invoking 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination.
"It’s a bad and questionable decision," said Dennis Fischer, a longtime criminal appellate lawyer.
Tom’s attorney Marc Zilversmit said he is deciding whether to petition the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the issue or renew his arguments in the state court of appeal.
"It’s a very dangerous ruling," Zilversmit said. "If you say anything to the police, that can be used against you. Now, if you don’t say anything before you are warned of your rights, that too can be used against you."
The state Supreme Court in a 4-3 ruling said Tom needed to explicitly assert his right to remain silent — before he was read his Miranda rights — for the silence to be inadmissible in court.
http://news.msn.com/crime-justice/court-silence-can-be-used-against-suspects


So…. You have to invoke your right in order to use it? I thought the whole point of “rights” was to have then no matter what…

thinksquad:

The California Supreme Court has ruled that the silence of suspects can be used against them.

Wading into a legally tangled vehicular manslaughter case, a sharply divided high court on Thursday effectively reinstated the felony conviction of a man accused in a 2007 San Francisco Bay Area crash that left an 8-year-old girl dead and her sister and mother injured.

Richard Tom was sentenced to seven years in prison for manslaughter after authorities said he was speeding and slammed into another vehicle at a Redwood City intersection.

Prosecutors repeatedly told jurors during the trial that Tom’s failure to ask about the victims immediately after the crash but before police read him his so-called Miranda rights showed his guilt.

Legal analysts said the ruling could affect future cases, allowing prosecutors to exploit a suspect’s refusal to talk before invoking 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination.

"It’s a bad and questionable decision," said Dennis Fischer, a longtime criminal appellate lawyer.

Tom’s attorney Marc Zilversmit said he is deciding whether to petition the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the issue or renew his arguments in the state court of appeal.

"It’s a very dangerous ruling," Zilversmit said. "If you say anything to the police, that can be used against you. Now, if you don’t say anything before you are warned of your rights, that too can be used against you."

The state Supreme Court in a 4-3 ruling said Tom needed to explicitly assert his right to remain silent — before he was read his Miranda rights — for the silence to be inadmissible in court.

http://news.msn.com/crime-justice/court-silence-can-be-used-against-suspects

So…. You have to invoke your right in order to use it? I thought the whole point of “rights” was to have then no matter what…

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

August 19, 2014

(Source: cartoonpolitics, via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

August 19, 2014
theweekmagazine:

Today’s best editorial cartoons

theweekmagazine:

Today’s best editorial cartoons

(via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

August 19, 2014
It’s sad that this had become fact these days…

It’s sad that this had become fact these days…

(Source: endofdayz, via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

August 19, 2014

(Source: mamikaze, via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

August 19, 2014
The hypocrisy never ends…

The hypocrisy never ends…

(Source: christopherstreet, via truth-has-a-liberal-bias)

June 24, 2014
If I get asked to pick up a shift and can’t think of an excuse fast enough…

callbellnightmares:

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »